ABSTRACT
High-sensitivity cardiac troponins expedite the evaluation of patients with chest pain in the emergency department. The utility of troponins extends beyond the acute coronary syndromes to accurate the diagnosis of myocardial injury. Troponins are best friends for physicians;however, they are a double-edged sword if not interpreted appropriately. Misdiagnosis is harmful with regard to patient outcomes. The present review focuses on the recent updates in the understanding and interpretation of high-sensitivity troponins in various acute clinical settings. Common mistakes and gray zones in the interpretation of troponins, the concept of myocardial injury versus infarction, newer entities like myocardial infarction (MI) with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries, recent controversies over the definition of periprocedural MI, complementary role of imaging in the diagnosis of myocardial injury and the role of troponins in the current COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.Copyright © 2022 Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Acute myocarditis corresponds to an acute inflammation of the myocardium whose origin is most often viral. Several viruses can be incriminated to note the parvovirus B19, the virus herpes of the group 6 and to a lesser degree the virus of the hepatitis C (VHC) [18,19]. Since 2019 and with the discovery of SARS COV2 some cases of myocarditis associated with covid have been noted, this last association is rare and is present in only 5% of cases [8]. The diagnosis of myocarditis is sometimes difficult and can lead to confusion with acute coronary syndrome, especially in cases of ST-segment elevation on the EKG, hence the interest of magnetic resonance imaging, which has made it possible in recent years to reduce the rate of unnecessary coronary angiography, especially in the case of young subjects with no cardiovascular risk factors. in this context we report the case of a 33 year old patient with no cardiovascular risk factors and no medical or surgical antecedents who was admitted to the emergency department for the management of acute chest pain related to acute post-covid myocarditis, the patient was initially admitted to the cardiology intensive care unit where he was put in condition and under analgesic treatment and under therapeutic protocal of covid 19 and under anticoagulation based on low molecular weight heparin at preventive dose with a good clinical evolution he was transferred thereafter to the clinical cardiology then declared outgoing under treatment of covid 19 with an appointment of control in 1 month.
ABSTRACT
The experience of managing patients with COVID-19 around the world has shown that, although respiratory symptoms predominate during the manifestation of infection, then many patients can develop serious damage to the cardiovascular system. However, coronary artery disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. The purpose of the review is to clarify the possible pathogenetic links between COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), taking into account which will help to optimize the management of patients with comorbid pathology. Among the body's responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection, which increase the likelihood of developing ACS, the role of systemic inflammation, the quintessence of which is a "cytokine storm" that can destabilize an atherosclerotic plaque is discussed. Coagulopathy, typical for patients with Covid-19, is based on immunothrombosis, caused by a complex interaction between neutrophilic extracellular traps and von Willebrandt factor in conditions of systemic inflammation. The implementation of a modern strategy for managing patients with ACS, focused on the priority of percutaneous interventions (PCI), during a pandemic is experiencing great difficulties due to the formation of time delays before the start of invasive procedures due to the epidemiological situation. Despite this, the current European, American and Russian recommendations for the management of infected patients with ACS confirm the inviolability of the position of PCI as the first choice for treating patients with ACS and the undesirability of replacing invasive treatment with thrombolysis.Copyright © 2023 Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019, also known as the COVID-19 pandemic has had a deleterious impact on daily living, with health and socioeconomic effects of a global magnitude. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), an important cardiovascular disease with significant morbidity and mortality rates, has been frequently reported in patients with this novel virus. This review aims to discuss the potential associations between COVID-19 and ACS with the use of multiple databases, including but not limited to; PubMed, ScienceDirect, World Health Organization, and American Heart Association. We have explored the pathophysiology of ACS, focusing on COVID-19 in particular with the use of various works of literature that highlights the pattern of viral entry and replication via the angiotensin-converting enzyme II. The review has also discussed the impact of the pandemic on hospital admissions, diagnosis, and management of ACS patients, as well as briefly highlighted a possible link between the widely available COVID-19 vaccines and possible cardiovascular complications. The association between COVID-19 and ACS needs more in-depth studies to help establish whether there exists a direct causal and or inciting correlation between them. Understanding this association might lead to new research and treatment options for ACS patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Kounis syndrome is a rare clinical condition characterized by the occurrence of an acute coronary event induced by an acute allergic episode. The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has contributed to an increase in the incidence of allergic reactions to a certain extent, thereby increasing the incidence of Kounis syndrome. Timely diagnosis and effective management of this disease are important in clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 43-year-old woman who developed generalized pruritus, breathlessness, paroxysmal precordial crushing pain, and dyspnea after receiving the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. After anti-allergic treatment and therapy for acute myocardial ischemia, her symptoms resolved with improvement in cardiac function and resolution of ST-segment changes. The prognosis was satisfactory, and the final diagnosis was type I Kounis syndrome. CONCLUSION: This patient with type I Kounis syndrome rapidly developed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after an acute allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine. âTimely diagnosis of acute allergic reaction and ACS, and targeted treatment based on the relevant guidelines are the key to successful treatment of the syndrome.â.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Kounis Syndrome , Humans , Female , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines , China , Chest Pain , Dyspnea , Rare DiseasesABSTRACT
Background: Even in the chaotic situation of COVID-19 pandemic, persons with ACS symptoms must seek medical attention as soon as they can in order to get immediate medical care from health staffs at hospital. Immediate medical attention on ACS patients related to better outcomes.Objective: This study aimed to investigate patient with ACS about their behavior and experiences in seeking medical helps during COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: Thirty ACS patients from three different hospitals in Yogyakarta, Indonesia participated in this prospective qualitative research. An in-depth interview that was audio-recorded was used to collect the data. All transcripts were processed to a thematic analysis.Results: In this study, three themes (treatment seeking behavior, impediments to obtaining medical care, and treatment experience) were developed to describe the situation among ACS patients during the COVID-19 viral outbreak. The process of obtaining medical assistance includes self-awareness, family, and neighbors. Therecommendation of Indonesia's insurance system and the distance to the hospital were factors of patient's consideration when choosing a hospital. Surprisingly, ACS patients in Yogyakarta - Indonesia during COVID-19 pandemic, conveyed their concerns to all health workers at hospital for their effective actions and good communication. To cope with their dread and COVID-19 condition, ACS sufferers found comfort in their faith in God's strength and in complying towards government regulations.Conclusion: According to this study, patients weren't always motivated to seek early medical attention in response to ACS symptoms. However, the individuals' experiences of having ACS symptoms were deemed as incomparable to the COVID-19 condition in Indonesia.
ABSTRACT
The experience of managing patients with COVID-19 around the world has shown that, although respiratory symptoms predominate during the man-ifestation of infection, then many patients can develop serious damage to the cardiovascular system. However, coronary artery disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. The purpose of the review is to clarify the possible pathogenetic links between COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), taking into account which will help to optimize the management of patients with comorbid pathology. Among the body's responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection, which increase the likelihood of developing ACS, the role of systemic inflammation, the quintessence of which is a "cytokine storm" that can destabilize an atherosclerotic plaque is discussed. Coagulopathy, typical for patients with Covid-19, is based on immunothrombosis, caused by a complex interaction between neutrophilic extracellular traps and von Willebrandt factor in conditions of systemic inflammation. The im-plementation of a modern strategy for managing patients with ACS, focused on the priority of percutaneous interventions (PCI), during a pandemic is experiencing great difficulties due to the formation of time delays before the start of invasive procedures due to the epidemiological situation. Despite this, the current European, American and Russian recommendations for the management of infected patients with ACS confirm the inviolability of the position of PCI as the first choice for treating patients with ACS and the undesirability of replacing invasive treatment with thrombolysis.
ABSTRACT
The efficacy of mefloquine has not been studied in the in vivo experiments and clinical trials involving COVID-19 patients. The study was aimed to assess the effects of mefloquine on the SARS-CoV-2 accumulation in the lungs of infected animals and to study the efficacy and safety of mefloquine compared to hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19. During the experiment, a total of 96 Syrian hamsters were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Accumulation of the virus in lungs was compared in the groups of animals treated with mefloquine and ribavirin and in the control group. During the clinical trial, the mefloquine and hydroxychloroquine safety and efficacy in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19 (172 individuals) was assessed based on the symptom changes over time and the computed tomography results. The experiment showed that the SARS-CoV-2 accumulation in the lungs of Syrian hamsters 6 days after infection and mefloquine treatment was 2.2 +/- 0.18 lg PFU/g, which was lower (p < 0.05) than in the control group (3.5 +/- 0.21 lg PFU/g) and ribavirin group (5.2 +/- 0.05 lg PFU/g). During the clinical trial, it was found that 50.0% of patients in the mefloquine group and 32.4% in the hydroxychloroquine group (p < 0.05) developed a mild disease, and the completely resolved respiratory failure was registered in 76.5% and 44.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 86.7 % and 77% of patients in the mefloquine and hydroxychloroquine groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Thus, during the experiment, mefloquine contributed to the faster virus titer reduction in the lungs. During the clinical trial, the mefloquine efficacy was non-inferiority or, based on a number of indicators, higher compared to hydroxychloroquine, with comparable safety.Copyright © Extreme Medicine.All right reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Atrial fibrillation and/or flutter is a common comorbidity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Objective(s): We aimed to assess the effect of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients in a nationally representative sample. Method(s): We conducted a population-based analysis utilizing data from the national inpatient sample database. Hospitalized adults >= 18 years who were hospitalized with COVID-19 during the year 2020 were included. We used multivariate logistic regression models to investigate the outcomes in patients who had atrial fibrillation or flutter. Result(s): Among 1,018,115 (Nationally weighted sample) admissions with COVID-19, 154795 cases (15.2%) had atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Patients with atrial fibrillation and/or flutter had significantly higher adjusted odds of all-cause in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.78 [confidence interval (CI), 1.75-1.80]), acute stroke (OR, 1.96 [CI, 1.85-2.07]), acute coronary syndrome (OR, 1.43 [CI, 1.37-1.48]), acute heart failure (OR, 4.24 [CI, 4.15-4.34]), cardiogenic shock (OR, 3.07 [CI, 2.85-3.30]), need for vasopressors (OR, 2.14 [CI, 2.06-2.22]), cardiac arrest (OR, 1.95 [CI, 1.89-2.02]), need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.79 [CI, 1.77-1.82]), acute kidney injury (OR, 1.25 [CI, 1.23-1.27]), major bleeding (OR, 1.82 [CI, 1.73-1.92]) compared to those patients without atrial fibrillation or flutter. On subgroup analysis, the risk for mortality was highest among atrial flutter (OR, 2.91), followed by atrial flutter and fibrillation group (OR, 2.38), followed by only atrial fibrillation group (OR, 1.71) (P value <0.001 for all) when compared to non-atrial fibrillation, non-atrial flutter in patients with COVID-19. Conclusion(s): Atrial fibrillation and flutter are associated with higher inpatient mortality and worse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: The objective of this study was to seek the opinion of Indian health-care professionals (HCPs) about hypertension (HTN) care during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. Methods: HCPs' opinions (n = 2832) were recorded based on survey and round table meetings. Standard questionnaire consisting of nine questions pertaining to HTN care in COVID-19 was prepared, discussed, and evaluated by experts who treat patients with HTN during COVID-19 era. Results: Smoking/tobacco use, obesity, and comorbidities (diabetes/dyslipidemia) were ranked as the top three modifiable risk factors. A total of 37% and 33% of HCPs reported an increase in blood pressure (BP) during the lockdown period in 10%–20% and 20%–40% of hypertensive patients, respectively, who were on monotherapy. Around 35% of HCPs reported that 20%–30% of their patients with HTN showed uncontrolled BP (>150/100 mmHg). Dual-drug therapy in patients with uncontrolled BP was preferred by 56% of HCPs. Nearly 71% preferred dual combination for HTN management. In dual combination, 27% preferred angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) + diuretic, 26% preferred ARB + calcium channel blockers, and 18% preferred ARB + beta-blockers. The majority of HCPs (44%) consider that <30% of their patients with HTN check BP at home. A total of 47% of HCPs reported acute coronary syndrome as the most common HTN-related complication. The majority of HCPs (57%) considered that avoiding contamination during BP measurement is the challenging parameter. Around 32% considered self-BP monitoring (SBPM) as the best method to improve medication adherence. Conclusion: SBPM, combination therapies, and digital connect with patients are critical aspects of HTN management during COVID-19 pandemic. © 2023 The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus infection (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health problem associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. In this difficult time, the topic of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is complicated by a number of clinically significant issues, such as COVID-induced myocardial damage, uncertainty of this emergency management, the need for a clear optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic measures, as well as ensuring maximum protection of medical personnel. In addition, there is a decrease in the number of hospitalizations for ACS worldwide, which is associated with the reluctance of patients to seek medical help and the redirection of medical resources in favor of combating the pandemic. Given that the primary pathophysiological mechanism of COVID-19 is a significant shift in blood coagulation rates, it is necessary to establish a relationship between this infection and an increased risk of acute coronary disease. The high risk of developing ACS associated with COVID-19 may be associated with atherosclerotic plaque rupture caused by endothelial cell damage, cytokine storms and the patient's inflammatory status. In this review will present aspects of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, clinical course and treatment of ACS, as well as published data on the results of treatment of coronary syndrome in a pandemic.Copyright © 2022 by the Author(s).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection have an increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. However, data on acute cardiovascular complications during delivery admissions remain limited. OBJECTIVE(S): To determine whether birthing individuals with COVID-19 have an increased risk of acute peripartum cardiovascular complications during their delivery admission. METHOD(S): This population-based retrospective cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample (2020) by utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify delivery admissions with a diagnosis of COVID-19. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to report an adjusted odds ratio for the association between COVID-19 and acute peripartum cardiovascular complications. RESULT(S): A total of 3,458,691 weighted delivery admissions were identified, of which 1.3% were among persons with COVID-19 (n=46,375). Persons with COVID-19 were younger (median 28 vs. 29 years, p<0.01) and had a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm births and Cesarean delivery (p<0.01). After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, insurance, and income, COVID-19 remained an independent predictor of peripartum cardiovascular complications including preeclampsia (aOR 1.33 [1.29-1.37]), peripartum cardiomyopathy (aOR 2.09 [1.54-2,84]), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (aOR 12.94 [8.85-18.90]), and cardiac arrhythmias (aOR 1.55 [1.45-1.67]) compared with no COVID-19. Likewise, the risk of in-hospital mortality, AKI, stroke, pulmonary edema, and VTE was higher with COVID-19. For resource utilization, cost of hospitalization ($5,374 vs. $4,837, p<0.01) was higher for deliveries among persons with COVID-19. CONCLUSION(S): Persons with COVID-19 had a higher risk of preeclampsia, peripartum cardiomyopathy, ACS, arrhythmias, in-hospital mortality, pulmonary edema, AKI, stroke, and VTE during delivery hospitalizations. This was associated with an increased cost of hospitalization. Keywords: COVID-19, Pregnancy, GDM, PCOS, Preeclampsia, CVD, Cardiovascular Disease Abbreviations: COVID-19: Coronavirus disease-2019, GDM: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, PCOS: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, National Inpatient Sample: NIS, AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HCUP: the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Funding and Conflicts of Interest Dr. Michos reports Advisory Board participation for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esperion, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
In an ever-changing information flow on coronavirus disease 2019 by the fact that the infection symptoms were mild, followed by signs (COVID-19) pandemic, we describe a case series of mitral valve chordal of probable endomyocarditis, unrecognized in time, and acute mitral rupture (MVCR) in non-comorbid middle-aged men that occurred over valve regurgitation developed against the background of physical a period of 3 to 5 weeks after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome provocation (exercise and cough). Two patients had previously been CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. With significant advances diagnosed with mitral valve prolapse (myxomatous degeneration in the prevention of acute rheumatic fever, the treatment of bacterial and connective tissue disease). Two patients were successfully endocarditis and acute coronary syndrome, acute mitral regurgitation operated on in different clinics. The described cases emphasize that has become a relatively rare diagnosis. During the pandemic, there has the consequences of inflammation persistence may be more severe been a surge in the incidence of spontaneous MVCR, and new data on than the primary viral damage, which determines the importance of a the problem are accumulating. The presented case series are united comprehensive examination and long-term follow-up. To date, the differential diagnosis of patients with sudden onset of dyspnea and chest pain associated with an infectious process should include MVCR.Copyright © 2023 Vserossiiskoe Obshchestvo Kardiologov. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: One of the potentially fatal consequences for diabetic patients is diabetic ketoacidosis acidosis (DKA), which is also linked to poor hospital outcomes. There is no much information in literature about COVID-19 and how it relates to other hospitalizations. The impact of COVID-19 on in-hospital mortality and other clinically relevant outcomes for DKA patients is being investigated for the first time in this study. Method(s): Patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of DKA with or without a subsequent diagnosis of COVID-19 Infection were found in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who have COVID-19 and those who don't. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to account for frequent confounders and assess the risk of mortality and in-hospital outcomes between the two groups. Result(s): The total of 110,130 DKA admissions were identified between Jan and Dec 2020. COVID-19 Infection was diagnosed in 2,504 patients (2.2%). The average age of the cohort sample was 35 years old, 51% were male, and 60% were white. The average length of stay (LOS) was 3 days, and the average total hospital charges were 33,132 US dollars. The total number of patients who died was 225 patients. When the two groups were compared, COVID-19 Infection was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality among DKA patients (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.7-15.9, p=0.003). COVID-19 patients had a higher risk of acute respiratory failure (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-3.9, p< 0.001) and septic shock (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-9.8, p=0.003). There was no significant difference between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups in the risk of acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.49-3, p=0.66), cardiac arrest (OR 2, 95% CI 0.5-7.9, p=0.31), hypokalemia (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.4, p=0.214), deep vein thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14-2.4, p=0.47), or pulmonary embolism (OR 3.6, 95% CI 0.84 - 15.4, p=0.083). COVID-19 patients had a longer mean LOS (4.2 vs 2.9 days, p< 0.001) and higher mean total hospital charges (41,216 vs 32,973 $, p=0.004). Discussion/Conclusion: Patients admitted with DKA and concomitant COVID-19 infection found to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and worse hospital outcomes, particularly acute respiratory failure and septic shock. In comparison to non-COVID patients, COVID-19 patients have a longer mean LOS and a higher mean of total hospital charges.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus can damage respiratory, cardiovascular system by various mechanism which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in moderate to severe cases of infection with SARS-CoV-2. Materials and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study including 60 patients of age ≥18 years of either gender presenting to GTB Hospital diagnosed as positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and/or Rapid Antigen Test and belonging to moderate and severe category without any prior history of respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, renal illness, longterm corticosteroid, or immunomodulator use. The cardiac involvement was assessed by history, clinical examinations, and investigations. Results: Cardiovascular involvement was present in 25% patients. Cardiac involvement included ACS including ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (3.3%), non-STEMI (10%), unstable angina (1.67%), left ventricular hypertrophy (8.3%), bundle branch block (3.3%), atrial fibrillation (1.67%), and bradycardia (1.67%). Raised cardiac enzyme levels positively correlated with ECG abnormalities. Respiratory involvement was seen in 85% of patients. among which 56.7% patients in severe category, 41.67% patients in moderate category, and 1.67% patients in mild category as per CTSI scoring. There was lung parenchymal involvement with ground glass opacities in bilateral lungs (68.3%), lobar consolidation (6.7%), cavitatory lesion (5%), pulmonary edema (5%), pneumothorax (3.3%), emphysematous changes (3.3%), and bilateral pleural effusion (3.3%). Conclusion: ACS occurs frequently in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and it is associated with complications such as congestive heart failure, bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and heart block. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Asian Journal of Medical Sciences is the property of Manipal Colleges of Medical Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Description of case: We report a case of Tropheryma whipplei endocarditis, a rare cause of bloodculture-negative infective endocarditis (BCNIE). Due to its rarity and lack of availability of diagnostic tests in district hospitals, the diagnosis remains challenging. The objective of this case report is to increase physician awareness of this pathogen. A 61-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department with central chest pain at rest. A 12-lead ECG demonstrated ST- segment depression in V4-V6 leads, and his serial troponin levels were raised. He was commenced on treatment for acute coronary syndrome and transferred to the Coronary Care Unit. An echocardiogram showed a 15mm x 15mm vegetation in the aortic valve with mild aortic regurgitation. His initial microbiology workup, which included two sets of blood cultures (pre-antibiotics), MRSA screen & COVID-19 PCR, was negative. He was transferred to a cardiothoracic centre four days later. Pre-operative CT coronary angiogram showed severe three vessel coronary artery disease. He underwent triple coronary artery by-pass grafts and tissue aortic valve replacement. During early post-op recovery, he had fever episodes and an elevated C-reactive protein of 280 mg/L but normal white cell counts. He was treated with intravenous Tazocin for hospital-acquired pneumonia and discharged on doxycycline. Two weeks post-discharge, he had a positive 16S/18S PCR for Tropheryma whipplei on molecular analysis of the aortic valve. He was treated for Whipples endocarditis with a 4-week course of IV Ceftriaxone, followed by a 12-month course of oral Cotrimoxazole. The patient has reported doing well since the surgery. Discussion(s): Molecular assay with PCR of the heart valve is the mainstay of diagnosing Whipple's endocarditis. There have been 5 previously reported cases of Whipple's endocarditis in the United Kingdom in our knowledge. It is likely under-reported because of a reliance on tissue diagnosis. Preceding intestinal manifestations and arthralgia should raise its clinical suspicion for timely workup. Physician awareness of Whipple's Endocarditis is paramount in investigating for this pathogen.
ABSTRACT
The experience of managing patients with COVID-19 around the world has shown that, although respiratory symptoms predominate during the manifestation of infection, then many patients can develop serious damage to the cardiovascular system. However, coronary artery disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. The purpose of the review is to clarify the possible pathogenetic links between COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), taking into account which will help to optimize the management of patients with comorbid pathology. Among the body's responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection, which increase the likelihood of developing ACS, the role of systemic inflammation, the quintessence of which is a "cytokine storm" that can destabilize an atherosclerotic plaque is discussed. Coagulopathy, typical for patients with Covid-19, is based on immunothrombosis, caused by a complex interaction between neutrophilic extracellular traps and von Willebrandt factor in conditions of systemic inflammation. The implementation of a modern strategy for managing patients with ACS, focused on the priority of percutaneous interventions (PCI), during a pandemic is experiencing great difficulties due to the formation of time delays before the start of invasive procedures due to the epidemiological situation. Despite this, the current European, American and Russian recommendations for the management of infected patients with ACS confirm the inviolability of the position of PCI as the first choice for treating patients with ACS and the undesirability of replacing invasive treatment with thrombolysis.Copyright © 2023 Stolichnaya Izdatelskaya Kompaniya. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Kounis syndrome is defined by the appearance of acute coronary events associated to anaphylactic symptoms. The pathophysiological mechanism is still uncertain, however, coronary vasospastic activity secondary to a hypersensitivity type I response is postulated as a triggering factor. In the con-text of an accident due to a massive bee's attack, poisoning syndrome also occurs, where the poison components directly damage the myocardium. Kounis syndrome has been reported in SARS-CoV-2 infection, opening the possibility of other mechanisms, among which the cytokine storm stands out. This narrative review aims to consider the mechanisms of damage in Kounis syndrome secondary to poisoning by a massive bee attack and its relationship with the development of short-term complications.Copyright © 2023 Universidad de Antioquia.